Advanced search
Visit
10683
Last Updated: 2012/04/21
Summary of question
What is the tale of the Gharānīq
question
In the tradition of the Gharānīq, it has been mentioned that the Prophet (s) was deceived by Satan and he mentioned the idols of the pre Islamic era. If this story doesn’t possess any historical accuracy, then where has it come from?
Concise answer

The tradition of the Gharānīq is a fabrication created by the enemies of Islam in order to weaken the position of the Quran and the Prophet (s). Towards these ends, the following story has been created: The Prophet was busy reciting Surah Al-Najm when he reached the verse that said: أَ فَرَءَيْتُمُ اللَّاتَ وَ الْعُزَّى‏ وَ مَنَوةَ الثَّالِثَةَ الْأُخْرَى, (Have you considered Lāt and ‘Uzzā? And Manāt, the third one?). When he reached this part Satan caused him to recite the following words: ‘تلك الغرانيق العلى، و ان شفاعتهن لترتجى’, which mean: These are beautiful and lofty birds and there is hope of intercession from them. At this point, the Prophet prostrated and everyone else did the same. Then the Angel Gabriel descended and told the Prophet that he had not brought down those two verses and that they were the insinuations of Satan.

There is a large body of evidence that shows this tradition as having been a fabrication and all of the Islamic researchers, both from the Shia and the Sunni, have considered this tradition as being such.

Detailed Answer

In some books of the Ahl al-Sunnah, there are strange traditions which narrate the following story: The Prophet was busy reciting the Surah of Al-Najm when he reached the verse that said: أَ فَرَءَيْتُمُ اللَّاتَ وَ الْعُزَّى‏ وَ مَنَوةَ الثَّالِثَةَ الْأُخْرَى, (Have you considered Lat and ‘Uzza? And Manat, the third one?)[1]. When he reached this part Satan caused him to recite the following words: ‘تلك الغرانيق العلى، و ان شفاعتهن لترتجى’, which means: These are beautiful and lofty birds and there is hope of intercession from them.[2]

At this time, the polytheists became overjoyed and said: Up until now, Muhammad had never spoken of our gods in a positive fashion. At this point, the Prophet prostrated and they also did the same. Then the Angel Gabriel descended and told the Prophet that he had not brought down those two verses and that they were the insinuations of Satan. It was at this time that the verses of: (وَ ما أَرْسَلْنا مِنْ قَبْلِكَ مِنْ رَسُولٍ وَ لا نَبِيٍّ ...) were revealed![3]

Although some people who were inimical to Islam attempted to play on this story and even added certain embellishments to it, history has solidly shown that this was a fabricated tradition. Furthermore, it is apparent that this tradition was created in order to weaken the position of the Quran as the word of God, and the position of the Prophet (s) as His messenger. There are several proofs showing the fabricated status of this tradition and we will mention these below:

1- According to researchers, the narrators of this tradition are weak and unreliable. It’s attribution to Ibn ʿAbbās is also a matter of uncertainty. According to Muḥammad Ibn Isḥāq, this tradition is the fabrication of the Zanadiqah (atheists) and he has also written a book on this subject.[4]

2- Numerous traditions have been narrated in various books on the revelation of Surah Najm and how the Prophet (s) and the rest of the Muslims prostrated upon reciting it. However, not one of these traditions mentions the story of the Gharānīq and this shows that the other part of the tradition was added during a later time.[5]

3- The beginning verses of Surah Najm explicitly counter any such claims by saying: ‘By the star when it sets: Your companion has neither gone astray, nor gone amiss. Nor does he speak out of [his own] desire: it is just a revelation that is revealed [to him],’[6] This verse very clearly destroys the fabricated addition of the Gharānīq.

4- All the verses which follow the aforementioned verse contain only words against the idols: ‘That, then, will be an unfair division! These are but names which you have coined—you and your fathers—for which Allah has not sent down any authority. They follow nothing but conjectures and the desires of the [lower] soul, while there has already come to them the guidance from their Lord.’[7]

In light of such severe censure against idolatry, how is it possible that words of praise could have been mentioned just a few verses beforehand? In addition, God has mentioned in the Quran that he has protected his book from all distortion and alteration: ‘Indeed We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed We will preserve it.’[8]

5- The Prophet’s (s) opposition against idolatry was one of a very severe and uncompromising nature; it continued from the beginning of his life until the very end. Even under the strain of the severest hardship, the Prophet (s) was never willing to compromise with the issue of idolatry and he showed this attitude through his actions. With such a precedent, how can anyone believe that he would have mentioned such words?

6- Even those who aren’t of the Muslim faith consider the Prophet (s) as an aware and intellectual individual; through the force of his ideas and character, he was able to transform the world, both during his lifetime, as well as after his passing. Would such an individual speak words supporting idolatry and idol worship? No rational individual can accept such a thing from such a pivotal historical figure.

It is clear that the supposed tradition of the Gharānīq is a fabrication created by the enemies of Islam and spread by people without sufficient knowledge; it was designed to weaken the position of the Quran and the Prophet (s). Virtually all of the Islamic researchers have rejected the validity of this tradition and they have considered it the work of forgers.[9]

Some commentators have postulated some possibilities for this tradition but these would only be considered valid if the tradition itself was valid. What they have mentioned is that the Prophet (s) would at times pause in between verses in order that the people could absorb what had just been recited. In between one of these pauses, after the verse of أَ فَرَأَيْتُمُ اللَّاتَ وَ الْعُزَّى وَ مَناةَ الثَّالِثَةَ الْأُخْرى had been recited, one of the polytheists recited these words as a way of mocking the Prophet (s) and confusing the people. In spite of this, the following verse answered them in full and condemned the practice of idolatry.[10]

Some individuals desired to show the Prophet (s) as being compromising towards idolatry in order to attract and absorb the polytheists into the Muslim faith, but this is also incorrect as history has shown. In history, we see many examples where the polytheists attempted to persuade the Prophet (s) to be lenient towards their practices and they were even willing to pay very large amounts of money and make the Prophet (s) their tribal ruler, but the Prophet (s) refused all of these offers and never wavered in his position against idolatry.[11]

 


[1] Surah Najm, Verses 19 and 20.

[2] Gharaniq is the plural form of Ghurnuq which is a white or black sea bird; this term also has other meanings (Ghamus al-Lughah).

[3] Under the verse at hand, in the Tafsir of Al-Mizan, this tradition has been narrated by a group of memorizers of the Quran affiliated with the Sunni school, Ibn Hajar being one of them.

[4] Tafsir Kabir, Fakhr Razi, vol. 23, p. 50.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Surah Najm, Verse 1, 2, 3, and 4. (وَ ما يَنْطِقُ عَنِ الْهَوى‏ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْيٌ يُوحى‏.)

[7] Surah Najm, Verse 23. (إِنْ هِيَ إِلَّا أَسْماءٌ سَمَّيْتُمُوها أَنْتُمْ وَ آباؤُكُمْ ما أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ بِها مِنْ سُلْطانٍ إِنْ يَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا الظَّنَّ وَ ما تَهْوَى الْأَنْفُسُ وَ لَقَدْ جاءَهُمْ مِنْ رَبِّهِمُ الْهُدى‏.)

[8] Surah Hijr, Verse 9: (إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَ إِنَّا لَهُ لَحافِظُونَ)

[9] Majma’ al-Bayan, Tafsir Fakhr Razi, Qurtubi, Fi Dhilal, Tafsir Safi, Ruh al-Ma’ani and Al-Mizan and other tafsir books under the verses being discussed.

[10] Tafsir Qurtubi, vol. 7, p. 4474. Tabarsi has also mentioned it as a possibility in Majma’ al-Bayan.

[11] Quoted from Tafsir Nemouneh, vol. 14, pp. 142-145.

 

Question translations in other languages
Comments
Number of comments 0
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Thematic Category

Random questions

  • Is it forbidden to use vanilla extract?
    18808 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/06/21
    Office of Grand Ayatollah Khamenei (may Allah grant him long life):If the alcohol is not intoxicating and it is not in a liquid form either, it is halal.Office of Grand Ayatollah ...
  • Why do jurisprudents and theologians oppose the notion of wahdat al-wujud?
    15170 Theoretical 2012/12/23
    1. The notion of 'wahdat al-wujud' [Unity of Being] is a monistic understanding of tawheed, the doctrine of oneness of God. It is considered one of the most fundamental concepts in mysticism and in mystical schools especially that of Ibn Arabi. According to this principle, existence [wujud] ...
  • Is it permissible to steal from internet websites?
    6865 Laws and Jurisprudence 2012/02/15
    Since you want the Islamic law about the question in your email, we deemed it necessary to forward the same question to the offices of some of the living prominent jurists. The answers which we have received from them are as under:Office of Grand Ayatollah Sistani (may ...
  • How do you define assassinations? Do you have any suggestions to stop such acts?
    7130 Traditional 2010/05/20
    Usually the arrogant world powers and people who are attached to this world, in order to strip away people’s rights, first accuse them of things such as assassination, and subsequently torture and murder them under the pretexts of fighting and prevention of terrorism and the ...
  • Is the consent of the first wife a condition of validity in re-marriage? Is the marriage contract valid if there is no attraction?
    12575 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/09/22
    Islam recognises the permissibility of a man having four permanent and concurrent wives.  The second marriage is not conditional upon consent of the first wife, except in the case of marriage with the wife’s niece (her brother’s daughter, or sister’s daughter).  But, if the ...
  • What is the ruling on shaving the legs for men?
    10490 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/08/22
    Except for the beard, which is haram to shave (obligatory precaution),[1] not only is it permissible to remove the hairs of the body such as the armpits, but it is mustahabb[2] in Islam, and has been ...
  • Can you provide us with some information about Prophet Idris (a.s.)?
    16921 Traditional 2013/07/15
    Prophet Idris’ name has been mentioned twice in the Quran, he has been revered and celebrated as truthful, prophet, patient, righteous etc. Prophet Idris is among the grandsons of Prophet Seth reaching Adam (a.s.) through five intermediaries. One of his grandfathers is Prophet Noah (a.s.). Most historians ...
  • What is Nafaqah?
    14118 Laws and Jurisprudence 2012/04/19
    ‘Nafaqah’ is a jurisprudential term used for women, kin (relatives) and property. It is predominantly used for women/wives and denotes the financial support that is obligatory upon men (when certain conditions are met) to provide for their spouses.[1] The Nafaqah usually covers the wife’s ...
  • Is there any religious evidence to prove that burning the seeds of Esfand is useful for warding off the evil eye?
    46940 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/05/26
    Science and man's intellect are unable to perceive and understand some fact. The evil eye is a phenomenon which the human intellect and science have not been able to prove nor have they been able to find a concrete reason to refute its very existence.
  • What is your opinion regarding Darwin\'s evolution theory?
    9263 خلقت انسان 2015/09/14
    There are two theories among biologists regarding the creation of living beings including plants and animals. A) Transformism: The doctrine that living organisms have evolved from previously existing forms of unicellular beings that existed in oceans or in the mud deep underwater. This change is also called ...

Popular